Showing posts with label amazing johnathan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label amazing johnathan. Show all posts

Friday, August 31, 2007

This week's LasVegasWeekly.Com column

Reprinted from LasVegasWeekly.Com

In Vegas, let the N-word fly
By STEVE FRIESS

When it first happened, we were sure the remarks would prompt angry protests, demands for discipline, outrage and shock and righteous indignation. Instead, bafflingly, they prompted nothing of the sort.

The Amazing Johnathan is an edgy comic magician over at the Sahara who will be moving shortly to the Riviera. He’s been around Las Vegas forever, packs a good, consistent crowd and makes regular appearances on Comedy Central. And on Aug. 9, he came on our weekly celebrity-interview podcast “The Strip” and let loose the n-word five times and the c-word twice.

Our listeners around the world were certainly stunned. They wrote in droves debating whether what was stated was offensive, what he meant, whether his use of the word “honky” was equally alarming, whether we should have bleeped out the words or not.

African-American activists, however, took a startling pass. Las Vegas Review-Journal’s Norm Clarke said he didn’t even get the courtesy of returned calls or emails from leaders of the National Association of Black Journalists, which led the charge to have Don Imus fired earlier this year and who were coincidentally meeting in Vegas the day he lead his column with Johnathan’s remarks. Some of our black listeners told us they wrote to the NAACP, the NABJ and other civil rights groups but similarly heard no answers.

What did Johnathan say? You can see a longer transcript of this sequence by clicking here or listen to a clip of the remarks here. But to summarize, in a rant over the ill effects of political correctness in comedy, Johnathan responded to my question of what should’ve happened in the Michael Richards case thusly:

“What I think should've happened is, well, the manager should've thrown the black people out. That's what I think should've happened. If they were heckling him during the show, they were wrong. And anything you do, if you're heckling a comic and interrupting a show, you're a n***** at that point, you know what I mean, in my eyes. You're not an audience member, you're not a friend, you are the worst possible scenario. You're disrupting my job, so you're a n*****. I wouldn't yell that word out and tell them that, I would have handled it a little bit more differently. If I did use that word, it would've been funny. I mean, I've called women in the audience c***s and I've gotten away with it because they were c***s but I did it right. There is a way to do it right.”

Since that prompted no reaction from African-American forces, we’ve been pondering why. Is it that Johnathan's not a big enough star for their bother? That would be an odd way to decide what to be offended by -- and give an awful lot of license to an awful lot of people to use the word willy-nilly. And it’s also not true: Johnathan is arguable a bigger star than Richards, who had one claim to fame and wasn’t even selling out the Laugh Factory when he was heckled into insanity.

Perhaps the NAACP, having "buried" the n-word recently, is over it? (I posit that facetiously, actually.) Or maybe it’s that there's no video, a la the Richards or Imus things? That could be, but the odd thing here is that Richards used the words in anger in a momentary loss of control and Imus was attempting, however badly, to be funny. Johnathan essentially defined what he believes a "n*****" to be in a way that offers real insight into his thought process.

No, I don’t buy any of that. What this silence reflects is how the liberal elite view Las Vegas. They’d rather react to things that emerge in the coastal media -- Hollywood, D.C. or New York -- even though Vegas is where real Americans come for an awful lot of their entertainment.

In Vegas, we can only conclude, performers are free to say or do whatever they wish because the city and its entertainment offerings are already believed to be crass, low-brow and inconsequential. I can’t decide if that’s a victory for free speech or a defeat for good taste.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Is The "N-Word" Over?

I'm starting to think so, at least where black activists are concerned.

We've been deluged by emails from "The Strip" listeners and blog readers outraged by the easy use of the ultimate slur of black people (five times) and women (twice) made by longtime Vegas headliner and Comedy Central star The Amazing Johnathan on Aug. 9 on "The Strip.

Since that show aired, Norm Clarke in the Review-Journal did a major item on it on opening day of the National Association of Black Journalists convention here in Vegas. The NABJ was the leading activist group attacking Don Imus earlier this year. But Clarke says he got nary a returned call or email from anyone at the NABJ. Nor did the NAACP or any feminist groups take any public notice. Hear a 3-minute clip of the remarks here.

Is it that Amazing Johnathan's not a big enough star? That would be an odd way to decide what to be offended by -- and give an awful lot of license to an awful lot of people to use the word willy-nilly. Is it that there's no video, a la the Michael Richards thing? That could be, but the odd thing here is that Richards used the words in anger in a momentary loss of control; Johnathan essentially defined what he believes a "n-----" to be in a way that offers real insight into his thought process. Or, perhaps, the NAACP, having "buried" the N-word recently, is over it.

To refresh, Amazing Johnathan defended Richards' use of the n-word by saying: "
Anything you do, if you're heckling a comic and interrupting a show, you're a n---- at that point, you know what I mean, in my eyes. You're not an audience member, you're not a friend, you are the worst possible scenario. You're disrupting my job, so you're a n----. I wouldn't yell that word out and tell them that, I would have handled it a little bit more differently. If I did use that word, it would've been funny. I mean, I've called women in the audience c---s and I've gotten away with it because they were c---s but I did it right. There is a way to do it right."

I guess Amazing Johnathan's right.

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

To Bleep

The debate over this both in the blog comments, amongst my journalism colleagues via email and between me and Miles has been fascinating and valuable. But in the end we decided that this isn't the hill to die for, so the Aug. 9 episode of "The Strip" is now posted with bleeps and a warning at the beginning of the language to come.

However, I've done two unusual things. First, I've posted a transcript of the controversial discussion. You can read that here. Second, I've also posted a bleeped version of this sequence as well so that you can hear just this part if you wish to partake in this discussion and don't have the time at the moment to hear the entire conversation. Finally, Norm! of the Review-Journal has picked up the item and led with it today, so his take is here.

As I've said, I do all of this a bit grudgingly as I believe there are strong arguments to allow this to air without obfuscation. And I'll be addressing that in an essay somewhere soon.

The question now is, after all this hype, is the sequence as controversial as I've been making it sound. The folks in the chat on Tuesday night sure thought so.

To Bleep or Not To Bleep

Those of you who joined us last night for the taping of this week's episode of "The Strip" know that the comic magician The Amazing Johnathan made some shocking remarks in a defense of sorts of Michael Richards, the Seinfeld alum whose racial epithets on stage last November became a major scandal.

In the process, AJ used the "n" word five times and the "c" word twice. It is jarring audio, to say the least.

I am, this morning, seeking counsel from journalism ethicists who contemplate these matters often on whether to post the podcast version with or without bleeping out the offensive words. Miles is firmly advocating bleeps and I understand his view.

There are arguments on either side that are strong. My personal belief is that bleeping such words desensitizes people to their impact, does a disservice to the cause of showing just how ugly the world can be. I'm particularly perturbed when journalists dash-out, bleep or use the term "the n word" (as I did above, I know) when discussing the word itself. Not even in a semantical context can the word be spelled out, which I find very odd.

A podcast is not regulated by anybody nor is it, in our case, owned by a corporation. But I, too, am a media entity, an author and journalist for many important publications and I need to be cautious about what we end up doing. Any use of the actual word, whether I like it or not, is radioactive in this culture, and that radioactivity won't merely poison the person who actually said it.

I am interested in your thoughts, although this decision won't be made democratically. There is my own idealistic and, in my own mind, well-reasoned defense -- and then there is the reality of the real world. The real world, of course, is what pays our mortgage.

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

The Strip is LIVE tonight w/the shocking Amazing Johnathan

Join us for the live show at LVRocks.Com at 7:05 pm tonight for a shocking interview with The Amazing Johnathan in which he takes on some of his competing Strip magicians, among other startlingly frank observations!

Plus, news from Vegas, the tourist tip, letters, the poll and a new trivia question.

Catch it live or pick up the podcast on Thursday. Either way, see you soon.